02

Illegal Liquor Shops Near Highways & Sensitive Public Places

Court
High Court of Uttarakhand
Case No.
WPPIL No. 83/2026
Status
Disposed
Date of Filing
2026
Petitioner
National Public Service Trust
Cause of Action

Despite binding directions of the Supreme Court in State of Tamil Nadu v. K. Balu, liquor shops continued to operate near National/State Highways, hospitals, schools and residential colonies. Physical inspections on 27.06.2026 and 29.06.2026 revealed violations, but authorities failed to act on the petitioner's representation.

Decision / Present Status

The PIL stands disposed of. The Court did not issue the general survey direction sought in the petition, but granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned District Magistrate by representation. If such representation is made, the District Magistrate must consider it, hear all stakeholders, and take a decision in accordance with law within six weeks thereafter.

Reliefs Sought
  • 01Enforcement of Supreme Court directions in State of Tamil Nadu v. K. Balu
  • 02Closure/relocation of violating outlets
Case Timeline
02.07.2026
WPPIL disposed with liberty to approach District Magistrate

On 02.07.2026, the Bench disposed of WPPIL No.83 of 2026, granting liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation to the concerned District Magistrate regarding liquor shops allegedly running contrary to Supreme Court directives. The District Magistrate was directed to examine the matter and decide it within six weeks of such representation after hearing all stakeholders.

Orders & Case Documents
02.07.2026
Writ petition disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to the concerned District Magistrate.
Writ petition disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to the concerned District Magistrate. · High Court of Uttarakhand

The petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation to the concerned District Magistrate regarding running of liquor shops contrary to the directives of the Hon’ble Supreme Court.; If the petitioner makes such a representation, the concerned District Magistrate shall look into the matter and take a decision, after hearing all the stakeholders, as per law, within six weeks thereafter.

Public Information Disclaimer

Case summaries published on this portal are provided for institutional and public information only. They are not a substitute for the original judicial orders and documents. Visitors should refer to the original court records for authoritative text. Where an original order is available, it is provided for download.